<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Those Technological Breakthroughs&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/</link>
	<description>AutoSpeed's Blog. Opinion and Auto News Comment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:42:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-20371</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-20371</guid>
		<description>Yeah that&#039;s it. Just proper vaporisation of the fuel. All you need is a way to have all of the petrol in gas form when the plug fires. Which is a lot easier said than done.

The simpler methods involve heat and modified carburettor/injection sytems, the more comlex ones claim to change the chemical makeup of the fuel into one that is gaseous, cleaner, and faster burning (a process which currently leaves a lot to be desired, for automotive use anyway).

I am planning on using either heat or a mechanical device to vaporise fuel. Heat is easier for me to work with for now.

cya
Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah that&#8217;s it. Just proper vaporisation of the fuel. All you need is a way to have all of the petrol in gas form when the plug fires. Which is a lot easier said than done.</p>
<p>The simpler methods involve heat and modified carburettor/injection sytems, the more comlex ones claim to change the chemical makeup of the fuel into one that is gaseous, cleaner, and faster burning (a process which currently leaves a lot to be desired, for automotive use anyway).</p>
<p>I am planning on using either heat or a mechanical device to vaporise fuel. Heat is easier for me to work with for now.</p>
<p>cya<br />
Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Drennan</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-18724</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Drennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-18724</guid>
		<description>I was interested that one of the cars in the AXP (Automotive X Prize) - $10M to whoever can design a mass-producable 100 mpg or equivalent car, google it - is referred to as being able to achieve that by running on &quot;petrol vapor&quot;. Is that the sort of thing you are talking about Ben?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interested that one of the cars in the AXP (Automotive X Prize) &#8211; $10M to whoever can design a mass-producable 100 mpg or equivalent car, google it &#8211; is referred to as being able to achieve that by running on &#8220;petrol vapor&#8221;. Is that the sort of thing you are talking about Ben?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-17260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-17260</guid>
		<description>Fair call. However I think there are better ways to deliver fuel than through a non heated, pressurised nozzle. I&#039;ll be doing a pretty crude setup soon, just to run the car at idle. If I can reduce the fuel consumption at idle from 1.4-2.2 l/hr (so the trip computer says, which is pretty accurate under cruise conditions) to a constant 1-1.2 l/hr, I think I&#039;ll be on to something, and develop the idea further.

I&#039;ll keep you posted.

cya
Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair call. However I think there are better ways to deliver fuel than through a non heated, pressurised nozzle. I&#8217;ll be doing a pretty crude setup soon, just to run the car at idle. If I can reduce the fuel consumption at idle from 1.4-2.2 l/hr (so the trip computer says, which is pretty accurate under cruise conditions) to a constant 1-1.2 l/hr, I think I&#8217;ll be on to something, and develop the idea further.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep you posted.</p>
<p>cya<br />
Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Edgar</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-17008</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 05:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-17008</guid>
		<description>Ben, anyone can talk about this sort of stuff - you know, it&#039;s &quot;easy&quot; to improve fuel economy. The short answer is that it is NOT. 

If it was easy to gain a 50 per cent improvement in fuel economy with a minor trade off in power, don&#039;t you think it would be being done? Even DI petrol engines don&#039;t have anything like a 50 per cent improvement - perhaps you might like to read our DI article - http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_1761/article.html

By all means head off and experiment, but if you can gain in real world use even a 5-10 per cent improvement, you&#039;re doing well on a typical car of the last 10 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, anyone can talk about this sort of stuff &#8211; you know, it&#8217;s &#8220;easy&#8221; to improve fuel economy. The short answer is that it is NOT. </p>
<p>If it was easy to gain a 50 per cent improvement in fuel economy with a minor trade off in power, don&#8217;t you think it would be being done? Even DI petrol engines don&#8217;t have anything like a 50 per cent improvement &#8211; perhaps you might like to read our DI article &#8211; <a href="http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_1761/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_1761/article.html</a></p>
<p>By all means head off and experiment, but if you can gain in real world use even a 5-10 per cent improvement, you&#8217;re doing well on a typical car of the last 10 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16241</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16241</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why I said most, not all. The insight is already designed primarily for economy. But if it is a petrol engine without direct injection (I don&#039;t know much about DI petrols), it should be able to be measureably improved.

Remember the figures I worked on for your EF? I think it worked out to be about 18% efficient on a 100km/h cruise. Changing that shouldn&#039;t be that hard if you are prepared to redesign things, not just modify them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why I said most, not all. The insight is already designed primarily for economy. But if it is a petrol engine without direct injection (I don&#8217;t know much about DI petrols), it should be able to be measureably improved.</p>
<p>Remember the figures I worked on for your EF? I think it worked out to be about 18% efficient on a 100km/h cruise. Changing that shouldn&#8217;t be that hard if you are prepared to redesign things, not just modify them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Edgar</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16177</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 06:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16177</guid>
		<description>What else would we need? - in short, no idea. It would depend too much on the product, its engineering, cost etc

However, at least one thing would probably be installation on an AutoSpeed staffer&#039;s car so we could assess it for ourselves. I&#039;d really like to see the Honda Insight&#039;s fuel economy double - to be blunt, I think the likelihood is zero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What else would we need? &#8211; in short, no idea. It would depend too much on the product, its engineering, cost etc</p>
<p>However, at least one thing would probably be installation on an AutoSpeed staffer&#8217;s car so we could assess it for ourselves. I&#8217;d really like to see the Honda Insight&#8217;s fuel economy double &#8211; to be blunt, I think the likelihood is zero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16093</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16093</guid>
		<description>Ok so say someone had a fuel system designed for economy, that could double the economy in most cars, cost 5-10% in outright power, was installed on a common car, and was made available to you, with all questions answered to the best of the inventor&#039;s ability.

What else would you need to run an article on the fuel system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so say someone had a fuel system designed for economy, that could double the economy in most cars, cost 5-10% in outright power, was installed on a common car, and was made available to you, with all questions answered to the best of the inventor&#8217;s ability.</p>
<p>What else would you need to run an article on the fuel system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Edgar</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16089</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Edgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16089</guid>
		<description>Revetec wasn&#039;t covered when I was editor.

[shrug] I can write articles on breakthroughs that will never achieve any success. But that means that some articles on how to do real things, right now, won&#039;t appear - there&#039;s only so many editorial resources available. It&#039;s easiest for people to simply do their own web searches on things such as water powered cars, breakthrough engines, etc, etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Revetec wasn&#8217;t covered when I was editor.</p>
<p>[shrug] I can write articles on breakthroughs that will never achieve any success. But that means that some articles on how to do real things, right now, won&#8217;t appear &#8211; there&#8217;s only so many editorial resources available. It&#8217;s easiest for people to simply do their own web searches on things such as water powered cars, breakthrough engines, etc, etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16088</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16088</guid>
		<description>Come on Julian, share the not so groundbreaking &#039;breakthroughs&#039; with all of us. 
I concur most of them will never make it to production but, knowledge empowers all.  That knowledge shared may lead to a serious &quot;breakthrough&quot; that can be convincingly demonstrated. Perhaps a separate page briefly listing the &quot;breakthrough&quot; and its URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Julian, share the not so groundbreaking &#8216;breakthroughs&#8217; with all of us.<br />
I concur most of them will never make it to production but, knowledge empowers all.  That knowledge shared may lead to a serious &#8220;breakthrough&#8221; that can be convincingly demonstrated. Perhaps a separate page briefly listing the &#8220;breakthrough&#8221; and its URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oosh</title>
		<link>http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/comment-page-1/#comment-16067</link>
		<dc:creator>Oosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.autospeed.com/2008/01/15/all-those-technological-breakthroughs/#comment-16067</guid>
		<description>You also covered the Revetec engine here:
http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1500/article.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You also covered the Revetec engine here:<br />
<a href="http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1500/article.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.autospeed.com/cms/A_1500/article.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

